Myanmar coup is embarrassing for China

Therefore, it stands to reason that the coup in Myanmar – a country whose intervening military co-ops have long and sometimes close ties with China – will hardly be dispersed in Beijing. But this would be a mistake. It is certain that there was a clear rhetorical difference between the reaction of China and the reaction of Western capitals after the February 1 military intervention in Myanmar before the opening of the parliament, which witnessed hundreds of elected officials and activists, including civilians. Aung San Suu Kyi, detained. The former described the events as a “major cabinet reshuffle,” while the latter described the latter as an illegal seizure of power deserving of targeted sanctions. China has blocked a statement in the Security Council condemning the coup, but the deeply contested consequences of the coup present China a serious geopolitical headache. The wave of mass protests that rocked cities across the country took moments to anti-China ringtones, as protesters rallied outside the Chinese embassy in Yangon and called for a boycott of Chinese goods. Myanmar’s opponents have accused China of helping the military enforce internet censorship and providing illegal arms transfers to quell protests. Last week, China’s ambassador to the country denied these activities and said the current situation in Myanmar “is not at all what China wants to see.” He might be right. Beijing was likely satisfied with the status quo prior to the coup, a situation in which its state-owned enterprises invested in a list of companies across the country while its officials maintained ties not only with the military but perhaps even warmer ties with Suu Kyi and the National League. For the Democratic Party. The current situation puts a question mark on deals worth billions of dollars and is deepening anti-China sentiment in a strategic country along its borders. Quiet system on his doorstep. The New York Times noted: “The coup has complicated a geopolitical struggle over a country that has only recently emerged from diplomatic isolation.” China sought to make it an obedient neighbor, while the United States sought the right mix of pressure and encouragement to foster the transition to democratic rule. It is also unclear how much outside influence, from East or West, will affect the generals, whose fortified mentality has isolated Myanmar from the world for half a century. ”As the Biden administration struggles to muster the appropriate influence to pressure Myanmar’s generals, Beijing has its own problems. “China is the biggest loser from this coup,” Enzi Han, an associate professor at the University of Hong Kong, told the Atlantic newspaper, “The public relations it has undertaken to improve its image over the past five years of working with the National League for Democracy are all in vain. “After the 2015 elections in which the National League for Democracy took control of a government run by civilians, Suu Kyi chose China as the site of her first foreign trip.” This showed a clear indication that China’s worst nightmare will not come: that the National League for Democracy, which is As long as China considered it under the auspices of the West, or perhaps a puppet in its hand, it was not turning sincerely toward the West, ”Mary Callahan, associate professor of international studies at the Henry M. Jackson School of International Studies, told the Wall Street Journal that the SuKL affair A new engagement with Beijing is likely to be helpful in helping to calm the raging ethnic conflicts along China’s border with Myanmar. After the brutal military campaign against the Rohingya on the other side of the country – what then-US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson called “ethnic cleansing” or, as many international experts assert, genocide – both Suu Kyi and Chinese officials worked to protect Myanmar’s senior officers from International punishment, however, the military establishment remains wary of Beijing, for deep-rooted historical reasons as well as for China’s increasingly diverse points of contact in modernizing Myanmar. A former senior diplomat who met the commander told The Atlantic that General Min Aung Hling, the country’s top military commander and leader of the coup, “resented China’s role in the ethnic armed organizations in Myanmar.” “I haven’t seen him as a particularly friend of China.” This is not good news for Beijing. “They’ve spent a great deal of energy and time developing Aung San Suu Kyi – with some success,” Pelhari Kosikan, a former Singapore diplomat and chair of the Middle East Institute at the National University of Singapore, told the New York Times. Now they have to start over with a new group of generals, and these generals are not only difficult for the West. It is difficult for everyone. “As the protests continue, the possibility of a more bloody crackdown remains.” The big questions are whether the civil disobedience movement will continue and remain peaceful, and will the police and armed forces continue to avoid confrontation? ”Wrote Nicholas Koppel, former Australian ambassador to Myanmar.“ Min Aung Hling believes His forces, the Tatmadaw, are the Praetorian Guard of National Unity and Stability and will intervene in the event of riots or violence. ”A number of casualties have already occurred after reported incidents of security forces opening fire. But anti-coup activists will not be intimidated by the threat of violence. Demonstrators “It could happen at any time in Yangon, but we have to keep doing what we should do, even if the soldiers are willing to shoot us,” Thor Zhao, a 32-year-old, told my colleagues. ”Under the military dictatorship, no Nobody is safe, whether I go out on the streets or sit at home, so we chose to express our objection instead of remaining silent. ”